phone icon+7 (495) 649-87-12
divider

Archive


Successful deal about tariffs in the electric power industry

/ 0 Comments

Nadmitov, Ivanov and Partners Law Firm represented the interests of a large energy company – the interested party – in a lawsuit in the Supreme Court of the Republic of Bashkortostan, in a case of challenging the electricity transmission tariff set against the client. In support of the stated administrative claim, the administrative claimant pointed out that the contested regulatory legal act did not comply with current legislation, included unreasonable expenses in the tariff, the energy company did not meet the criteria of the territorial grid organization, and violated the principles of pricing principles in the field of price (tariff) regulation in the power industry. Also, the plaintiff presented an examination for which we prepared a review. The Supreme Court agreed with our objections to the stated arguments of the administrative claim and refused to satisfy the stated requirements to the administrative claimant, recognizing that the challenged normative legal act fully complies with federal legislation, issued by the authorized body within its competence in compliance with the established procedure.

Nadmitov, Ivanov and Partners Law Firm regularly represents clients in commercial disputes and in the field of energy and tariff regulation.


separator

Successful battery supply dispute

/ 0 Comments

Nadmitov, Ivanov and Partners Law Firm represented the interests of a large energy company – the defendant – in a lawsuit in the Arbitration Court of the city of Moscow in the case of debt collection for the goods delivered in the amount of 2 million rubles. During the consideration of the case, the Law Firm prepared and filed a counter-claim on the replacement of the delivered goods with the goods of the respective country of origin. The arbitration court refused to satisfy the original claim and satisfied the counterclaim, while proceeding from the fact that the delivery of the equipment provided for by the contract was not proven by the claimant; the delivery of the goods of the manufacturing country specified in the specification to the contract is an essential condition of the contract.

Nadmitov, Ivanov and Partners Law Firm regularly represents clients on contractual disputes, including disputes from supply contracts.


separator

NIP advised Rivulis on Russian law aspects of JV with Polyplastic Group

/ 0 Comments

Nadmitov, Ivanov and Partners Law Firm represented the interests of Rivulis Irrigation Ltd, an Israeli company, in relation to the establishment of a joint venture company with the Polyplastic Group on the matters of Russian law.

Our services included Russian law review of the terms of a corporate agreement concluded between shareholders of the Russian company governed under English law, the company’s charter and other contracts necessary for the joint venture company to function effectively.

Rivulis is one of the world leaders in the development of the solutions for the drip irrigation, and Polyplastic Group is the largest producer of polymer composite materials and piping systems for the networks of housing and public utilities infrastructure, industrial enterprises and agriculture in the post-Soviet area. Polyplastic-Rivulis Irrigation Pipeline Systems JVC will start the production of the drip tape and pipe this spring in the city of Volzhsky near Volgograd, in the largest agricultural region of Russia. The joint venture company will promote and sell products of the Rivulis and Eurodrip brands, components, including pipes and fittings, of the Polyplastic Group, as well as offer services for the installation and maintenance of drip irrigation systems. It is expected that the joint venture company will introduce the latest solutions in the field of drip irrigation into Russia, which will increase the yield and efficiency of agriculture.

Nadmitov, Ivanov and Partners Law Firm actively consults clients on mergers & acquisitions, shareholders agreements, joint ventures and other corporate transactions, preparation of contracts for the sale and purchase of shares, equity interests or assets, options and option agreements, convertible loans and all other necessary contractual documentation.


separator

Best Lawyers 2020 raiting Inclusion

/ 0 Comments

For the first time, lawyers of  Nadmitov, Ivanov and Partners law firm are included in the Best Lawyers 2020 rating – an independent rating based on the assessment of each other’s skills and knowledge by lawyers.

Managing partner of the firm Alexander Nadmitov was noted in the Best Lawyers 2020 rating in the category “Technology”. Also, partner of the company Sergey Lapin was noted in the category “Litigation”.


separator

Successful dispute in delivery

/ 0 Comments

Nadmitov, Ivanov and Partners Law Firm represented the interests of a large energy company as a defendant in a lawsuit in the Moscow Arbitration Court, in a case on collecting debt for goods delivered and interest on using other people’s funds in the total amount of 3 million rubles. In support of the claim by the supplier, signed invoices and the act of reconciliation of settlements were submitted. During the consideration of the case, we prepared and filed a counter-claim for termination of the contract in connection with the claimant’s violation of the essential terms of the supply contract, since the supplier supplied a cheaper equivalent of the declared products from another manufacturer. The arbitration court refused to satisfy the initial claim and satisfied the counterclaim of our client, while proceeding from the fact that the claimant did not prove that the equipment provided for by the contract was delivered; the presence of significant violations of the contract by the defendant confirmed.

Nadmitov, Ivanov and Partners Law Firm regularly represents clients on contractual disputes, including disputes from supply contracts.


separator

Labor dispute about reinstatement

/ 0 Comments

Nadmitov, Ivanov and Partners Law Firm successfully represented the interests of the state educational institution – the defendant in a labor dispute about reinstatement of an employee at work in the district court of the city of Vladimir. The employee filed a claim against the institution with demands for reinstatement, recognition of orders for disciplinary actions as illegal, recovery of average earnings during a forced absence, recovery of non-pecuniary damage and transportation expenses.

In the trial, evidence was presented that substantiated the legality of dismissing an employee for repeated violation of employment duties without valid reasons (presence of facts of violation of labor duties, absence of valid reasons for violation, compliance with the procedure for dismissal and proportionality of disciplinary measures).

According to the results of consideration of the dispute, the court of general jurisdiction made a decision to refuse to satisfy the claims.

Nadmitov, Ivanov and Partners Law Firm regularly represents the interests of employees and employers in labor disputes.


separator

Nadmitov, Ivanov and Partners are included in the list of the best companies in resolving disputes according to Pravo.ru

/ 0 Comments

According to the results of the study of the legal services market in the field of representation of interests in courts for 2018, conducted by the portal Pravo.ru,  Nadmitov, Ivanov and Partners were included in the number of firms leading in the field of judicial practice.


separator

Successful case of bringing to administrative responsibility for violation of legislation on currency control

/ 0 Comments

Nadmitov, Ivanov and Partners Law Firm successfully appealed to the Arbitration Court of Moscow resolutions of the tax authority on bringing the LLC to administrative responsibility under Art. 15.25 of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation for violation of the deadlines for submitting currency control documents to an authorized bank for amending transaction passports. Having accepted our objections and arguments, as well-founded, the arbitration court declared illegal and canceled completely the decisions of the tax authority on bringing the Company to administrative responsibility.

Nadmitov, Ivanov and Partners Law Firm successfully represents the interests of clients in disputes about bringing to administrative responsibility, declaring illegal the decisions of state bodies on bringing to administrative responsibility.


separator

Successful case of bringing to administrative responsibility

/ 0 Comments

Nadmitov, Ivanov and Partners Law Firm successfully represented the interests of the Chairman of the Board of a commercial bank at the Central Bank of the Russian Federation in the case of bringing an official to administrative responsibility under Art. 15.27 of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation for non-compliance with the legislation of the Russian Federation in the field of countering the legalization (laundering) of proceeds from crime and the financing of terrorism, in terms of organizing internal control. During the consideration of the issue of bringing an official to administrative responsibility, due to the submission of exhaustive arguments in support of the legal position of the bank, the Central Bank of the Russian Federation discontinued the administrative proceedings, applying the provisions of Art. 2.9 of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation on the insignificance of the alleged administrative offense.

Nadmitov, Ivanov and Partners Law Firm successfully represent the interests of clients in disputes about bringing to administrative responsibility, declaring illegal the decisions of state bodies on bringing to administrative responsibility.


separator

Alexander Nadmitov was noted in the rating of the newspaper “Kommersant”

/ 0 Comments

The annual rating “Leaders of the legal services market” from the Kommersant Publishing House noted the Managing partner of Nadmitov, Ivanov and Partners among the Top-5 lawyers in the category Retail and Trade, FMGG.


separator